Closed Bug 140321 Opened 24 years ago Closed 23 years ago

Tree with remote RDF datasource crashes

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Future

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: waterson)

Details

(Keywords: crash, testcase)

Attachments

(2 files)

2.31 KB, application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml
Details
748 bytes, text/rdf
Details
I have a simple tree template which has a remote RDF datasource, and whenever it is loaded it crashes the browser (2002041711 - a.k.a. 1.0RC1). If I use the same datasource, stored on the local machine, the template is built fine and there is no crash. Both the RDF and the XUL are fairly straightforward, and I will attach both as examples. I can reproduce this crash reliably.
Attached file XUL Testcase
UL to test this bug. Remember to change the datasource to point to the remote RDF file (which will soon be attached).
Attached file RDF Testcase
RDF to demonstrate this bug. Will crash the browser when referenced (as a datasource for the attached XUL) remotely, will work fine locally
Severity: normal → critical
Keywords: crash
This WFM with a trunk build on Linux; see: <http://www.maubi.net/~waterson/mozilla/bugs/140321.xul> Can anyone else reproduce? Is this Win32-only?
When I click on your example it worked fine, but mine still breaks.... I had my xul file in chrome, I wonder if that is somehow responsible.
I had a same crash at http://www.mozilla.org/rdf/doc/buddy.xul (RDF : http://www.mozilla.org/rdf/doc/buddy.rdf) (same build, same OS : Build 2002041711, Win2K)
WFM with 2002061408 on win2k. reporter (Sean): can you reproduce this bug with a recent version of mozilla (for example, 1.1alpha)? if so, please comment again with details. if not, please resolve this bug as WORKSFORME. thanks.
I just tested with 1.1a 200206104 Win32 and while it no longer crashes, the data doesn't fill the template when loaded from a remote datasource (but it works fine when the xul and rdf are local). This could very well be expected behavior, but I haven't found any documentation to say either way
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Target Milestone: --- → Future
WFM with 2003041416/trunk/W2K Marking such. Sean: Fill another bug report about problems described in comment #7.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Keywords: testcase
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
tever is not RDF QA anymore
QA Contact: tever → nobody
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: