Closed Bug 178128 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

Xft source files return compile time error

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
major

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: joshk, Assigned: blizzard)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

I am building Mozilla from source to a Phoenix distribution (using some stuff in my .mozconfig): export MOZ_PHOENIX=1 mk_add_options MOZ_PHOENIX=1 ac_add_options --enable-crypto ac_add_options --disable-tests ac_add_options --disable-debug ac_add_options --disable-mailnews ac_add_options --disable-composer ac_add_options --enable-strip ac_add_options --enable-strip-libs ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O3 -march=i686" ac_add_options --enable-xft ac_add_options --with-glib-prefix=/usr Configuring is all fine and dandy - there are no errors whatsoever. However after running make -f client.mk build: In file included from nsGfxFactoryGTK.cpp:65: nsFontMetricsXft.h:248: syntax error before `*' nsGfxFactoryGTK.cpp: In function `nsresult nsScriptableRegionConstructor(nsISupports *, const nsIID &, void **)': nsGfxFactoryGTK.cpp:171: warning: `class nsIScriptableRegion * inst' might be used uninitialized in this function make[5]: *** [nsGfxFactoryGTK.o] Error 1 Since I had grabbed a nightly bz2ball from the website, i ran a cvs update to see whether the problem had been rectified recently. These files ended up updating, so i made clean and tried again. Same problem. Mou... so close, yet so far to an xft enabled phoenix! (yes you should release official binaries for phoenix+xft :)) Thanks for all the hard work you guys, though. -Josh
you need xft 2.0 to build Mozilla with XFT support. We should be testing for this in configure...
Assignee: seawood → blizzard
Whiteboard: DUPEME
I had the same problem, this simple patch might fix it --- nsFontMetricsXft.h.old Mon Nov 4 10:05:21 2002 +++ nsFontMetricsXft.h Mon Nov 4 10:05:22 2002 @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ #include <X11/Xft/Xft.h> class nsFontXft; +class FcPattern; class nsFontMetricsXft : public nsIFontMetricsGTK {
Blocks: xft_tracking
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
I'm using Xft2 and am having this problem. It *appears* as if the problem is this: there is an Xft/Xft.h in /usr/X11R6/include/X11 and this one is being picked up instead of /usr/include/Xft2/X11/Xft/Xft.h reordering the compile to put -I/usr/X11R6/include at the end works. My world in which this is happening is: RedHat 7.3 w/ Ximian stuff: XFree86-devel-4.2.0-8 (has the rogue Xft.h) fontconfig-1.0.1-0.ximian.1 fontconfig-devel-1.0.1-0.ximian.1 Xft-2.0.0-0.ximian.1 Xft-devel-2.0.0-0.ximian.1 I hope that helps.
OK, so it's a problem with the include files on your system then.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
v invalid.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
*** Bug 183316 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 183341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 183337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 183337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
i believe comment #4 "OK, so it's a problem with the include files on your system then." is an incorrect diagnosis... it is the mozilla config scripts which are to lame as they should always place the fontconfig/Xft2 includes before the X11R6 ones (if they are different locations) a temporary workaround for me was to force the Xft2 includes at the front of the gcc queue with make CXX="$CXX -I/opt/gnome/include" since /opt/gnome is the prefix of my Xft2 and fontconfig installs. but i definitely believe this is not a problem with peoples 'include' setups, s there is no such thing as an "include setup"... mozilla does it all with configure. this is far from a "major bug". a quick hack in gfx/src/gtk/Makefile.in would be to do something like CXX += $(MOZ_XFT_CFLAGS) to ensure the XFT_CFLAGS are the first to be processed. i suppose... cheers, Sam
So you still have the old Xft.h hanging around? I still don't know what to do about that. I haven't been able to control the order of the includes properly. Chris, any ideas about that? I need to make sure that the includes for MOZ_XFT_CFLAGS come before the X11R6 includes.
Use LOCAL_INCLUDES instead of appending those variables to CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS.
Xft.h from fontconfig version 2.1 is not called Xft2.h as far as I can tell. Is moz 1.2.1 supposed to built cleanly from http://fontconfig.org/release/fcpackage.2_1.tar.gz or verison 2.0? I tried comment 2 but that didn't help. I'll try some of the configure ideas instead.
Reopening.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
*** Bug 184396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I tried using LOCAL_INCLUDES instead of appending it to the CFLAGS and it didn't make a difference. The Xft2 include came well after the X11R6 include.
as a hack, try appending MOZ_XFT_CFLAGS to CXX in this directory only.
Something's wrong there if X11R6 is showing up before LOCAL_INCLUDES. What does your compile line look like? In widget/src/gtk, LOCAL_INCLUDES are showing up well before the X11R6 includes.
Attached patch patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
oops, use tabs not spaces
Attachment #108789 - Attachment is obsolete: true
I didn't realize that LOCAL_INCLUDES was being squashed later in the makefile. This moves it before the include for X11R6.
Comment on attachment 108791 [details] [diff] [review] patch requesting review from cls
Attachment #108791 - Flags: review?(cls)
Attachment #108791 - Flags: review?(cls) → review+
Comment on attachment 108791 [details] [diff] [review] patch a=asa for checkin to 1.3a
Attachment #108791 - Flags: approval1.3a+
Checked in.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I just grabbed a fresh cvs and while the build was fine, I get this error: ~/mozilla/dist/bin-->./mozilla ./mozilla-bin: relocation error: /home/manuel/mozilla/dist/bin/components/libgfx_gtk.so: undefined symbol: XftLockFace ~/mozilla/dist/bin-->
Geez, sounds like we're linking against the old Xft library.
Well, i still don't follow how people have their libs called xft2, or something with a 2 in the lib's name lib.so.2, whatever, whereas my install from the latest fcpackage simply calls then xft, and I put them in /usr/local ml
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Whiteboard: DUPEME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: