Bug 12916 Comment 414 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

The key bit here are newer email standards like DKIM, SPF, and authenticated Submission-SMTP / SMTP AUTH. They mean that the demanded solution here *does not work*. It may happen to work on *your* particular server, but not for other users. If we build a feature into Thunderbird, it must work for everybody, not just some people. For special needs, indeed an extension / add-on is better. Onno Ekker, if you think that your solution is needed, I think it's indeed best for you to re-surrect the your extension and build it as WebExtension.

Apart from that: What Magnus said.
The key bit here are newer email standards like DKIM, SPF, and authenticated Submission-SMTP / SMTP AUTH. They mean that the demanded solution here *does not work*. It may happen to work on *your* particular server, but not for other users. If we build a feature into Thunderbird, it must work for everybody, not just some people. For special needs, indeed an extension / add-on is better. Onno Ekker, if you think that your solution is needed, I think it's indeed best for you to re-surrect the your extension and build it as WebExtension.

Apart from that: [What Magnus saidin comment 412](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12916#c412).
The key bit here are newer email standards like DKIM, SPF, and authenticated Submission-SMTP / SMTP AUTH. They mean that the demanded solution here *does not work*. It may happen to work on *your* particular server, but not for other users. If we build a feature into Thunderbird, it must work for everybody, not just some people. For special needs, indeed an extension / add-on is better. Onno Ekker, if you think that your solution is needed, I think it's indeed best for you to re-surrect the your extension and build it as WebExtension.

Apart from that: [What Magnus said in comment 412](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12916#c412).

Back to Bug 12916 Comment 414