Bug 1385014 Comment 7 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Bob Owen (:bobowen) from comment #6)
> aklotz - now we have an at least partly usable browser with win32k lockdown enabled, we can see these failing. Do you have an idea as to what type of thing we should see broken as a result of that?

IIRC this method is used in content for synchronous messages, so you'll probably see broken sync IPC calls from child to parent.

> 
> Presumably we can land a version of your patch that switches on `IsWin32kLockedDown` between the current code and your patch.

That's probably the best idea, yeah. Would you like me to prepare that, or are you going to handle it?
(In reply to Bob Owen (:bobowen) from comment #6)
> aklotz - now we have an at least partly usable browser with win32k lockdown enabled, we can see these failing. Do you have an idea as to what type of thing we should see broken as a result of that?

IIRC this method is used in content for synchronous messages, so you'll probably see broken sync IPC calls from child to parent. A11y is probably one area where this would be apparent.

> 
> Presumably we can land a version of your patch that switches on `IsWin32kLockedDown` between the current code and your patch.

That's probably the best idea, yeah. Would you like me to prepare that, or are you going to handle it?

Back to Bug 1385014 Comment 7