Bug 1437464 Comment 2 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

I'm going to deduplicate, just because bug 1246620 is a slightly more sophisticated proposition than I'm implementing in bug 1375156.

My plan is that bug 1375156 is a simple implementation where secret content from worker type definitions are simply relocated directly into taskcluster secrets named after the worker type.

In contrast, bug 1246620, which would still be nice to implement at some later point, allows properties inside the worker type definition `userData` sections to be derived from taskcluster secrets, by referring to secret keys inside the blobs. I choose to tackle the simpler implementation of bug 1375156 first, as this is currently blocking other outstanding work, and we have other pressing issues we need to address with higher priority. But I would still love it to be implemented at some point.

I'll update bug 1375156 to be more explicit about its scope.
I'm going to deduplicate, just because this bug is about a generic worker implementation of bug 1246620, which is a slightly more sophisticated proposition than I'm implementing in bug 1375156.

My plan is that bug 1375156 is a simple implementation where secret content from worker type definitions are simply relocated directly into taskcluster secrets named after the worker type.

In contrast, this bug, which would still be nice to implement at some later point, allows properties inside the worker type definition `userData` sections to be derived from taskcluster secrets, by referring to secret keys inside the blobs. I choose to tackle the simpler implementation of bug 1375156 first, as this is currently blocking other outstanding work, and we have other pressing issues we need to address with higher priority. But I would still love it to be implemented at some point.

I'll update bug 1375156 to be more explicit about its scope.

Back to Bug 1437464 Comment 2