(In reply to Martin Stránský [:stransky] from comment #68) > Hi, there are bug [1] reported against Red Hat Firefox flatpak [2]. Main goal of the RH flatpak repo was to provide FF flatpak until it's available from Mozilla which is done now so we (RH) should continue to support Mozilla FF flatpak only. > > I'll discuss that with RH folks how we can help here. Meanwhile Firefox flatpak linux integration bugs can be reported as Core/Widget:GTK where will be visible to me and can be fixed. Hi Martin, thanks for reaching out. * I see a very good list of issues there in the Redhat's flatpak. I wonder how many of those are still ongoing in the official Flatpak. Should we run through those at some point to see if they are still ocurring in the existing flatpak and transfer them in bugzilla? * I'm happy to use the `Core/Widget:GTK` component for stuff that's related to Linux integration. And maybe keep this component for issues related to release/shipping the flatpak? Since I'm actively triaging this component, I will try to exercise good judgment to triage correctly between them. Would that work for you? (In reply to Martin Stránský [:stransky] from comment #69) > btw. Bug 1278719 also tracks some Firefox specific flatpak issues although they may be related to flatpacks from https://firefox-flatpak.mojefedora.cz/. Mihai, do you mind to use the Bug 1278719 to also track Mozilla flatpak issues which are on Firefox side or is there any other tracker? Absolutely. To be honest, I've been using this bug for a long time as a "meta" tracker one and had some related children bugs in which I worked. I'm happy to use that bug from now one since this is resolved anyway.
Bug 1441922 Comment 70 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Martin Stránský [:stransky] from comment #68) > Hi, there are bug [1] reported against Red Hat Firefox flatpak [2]. Main goal of the RH flatpak repo was to provide FF flatpak until it's available from Mozilla which is done now so we (RH) should continue to support Mozilla FF flatpak only. > > I'll discuss that with RH folks how we can help here. Meanwhile Firefox flatpak linux integration bugs can be reported as Core/Widget:GTK where will be visible to me and can be fixed. Hi Martin, thanks for reaching out. * I see a very good list of issues there in the Redhat's flatpak. I wonder how many of those are still ongoing in the official Flatpak. Should we run through those at some point to see if they are still ocurring in the existing flatpak and transfer them in bugzilla? * I'm happy to use the `Core/Widget:GTK` component for stuff that's related to Linux integration. And maybe keep this component for issues related to release/shipping the flatpak? Since I'm actively triaging this component, I will try to exercise good judgment to triage correctly between them. Would that work for you? * with respect to https://firefox-flatpak.mojefedora.cz/ - I'm wondering whether there is a way to migrate those users to the official flatpak? (In reply to Martin Stránský [:stransky] from comment #69) > btw. Bug 1278719 also tracks some Firefox specific flatpak issues although they may be related to flatpacks from https://firefox-flatpak.mojefedora.cz/. Mihai, do you mind to use the Bug 1278719 to also track Mozilla flatpak issues which are on Firefox side or is there any other tracker? Absolutely. To be honest, I've been using this bug for a long time as a "meta" tracker one and had some related children bugs in which I worked. I'm happy to use that bug from now one since this is resolved anyway.