Bug 1444399 Comment 11 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

For example, 67 released recently with the pinning expiration time set to Aug 15 2019. Since we're planning on releasing 68 on/around Jul 9 2019 (according to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/Calendar anyway), those pins will still be active for about a month in 67 at that point. (So it looks like n+2 isn't really true any longer...)
In any case, when those pins expire, they won't be enforced, so expiry would make it easier to update rather than harder.
Some quick back-of-the-envelop calculations using https://mzl.la/2KqkNvl and buckets 32/33 (failures/successes for *.cdn.mozilla.net) indicate 160k failures vs 707m successes, or a failure rate of 0.02%. (I think I can run the numbers on release using atmo if necessary, but it might take a little while.)
For example, 67 released recently with the pinning expiration time set to Aug 15 2019. Since we're planning on releasing 68 on/around Jul 9 2019 (according to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/Calendar anyway), those pins will still be active for about a month in 67 at that point. (So it looks like n+2 isn't really true any longer...)
In any case, when those pins expire, they won't be enforced, so expiry would make it easier to update rather than harder.
Some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations using https://mzl.la/2KqkNvl and buckets 32/33 (failures/successes for *.cdn.mozilla.net) indicate 160k failures vs 707m successes, or a failure rate of 0.02%. (I think I can run the numbers on release using atmo if necessary, but it might take a little while.)

Back to Bug 1444399 Comment 11