Bug 1446040 Comment 8 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Looking at the crash dump from https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&author=mhowell%40mozilla.com&selectedJob=214658342 I see some very weird memory maps. There are many allocations as follows:

> 00002e200000    4kB NA      MAPPED
> 00002e201000 1024kB RW      MAPPED
> 00002e301000    4kB NA      MAPPED

Where MAPPED is the Windows VirtualQuery MEM_MAPPED flag.

I'm not 100% sure what the 1024 kB blocks are, but my best guess is they are jemalloc arena_chunk_t which require 1 MB alignment for correctness.

The patch I see here (https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/cc75dcc7e1e37c0680606181ad71e65dc8c09322) doesn't assert alignment after calling |chunk_apply_guards|.
(Jan asked me to take a look since I've studied our allocation behaviors around SpiderMonkey GC and jemalloc in the context of crash analysis).

Looking at the crash dump from https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&author=mhowell%40mozilla.com&selectedJob=214658342 I see some very weird memory maps. There are many allocations as follows:

> 00002e200000    4kB NA      MAPPED
> 00002e201000 1024kB RW      MAPPED
> 00002e301000    4kB NA      MAPPED

Where MAPPED is the Windows VirtualQuery MEM_MAPPED flag.

I'm not 100% sure what the 1024 kB blocks are, but my best guess is they are jemalloc arena_chunk_t which require 1 MB alignment for correctness.

The patch I see here (https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/cc75dcc7e1e37c0680606181ad71e65dc8c09322) doesn't assert alignment after calling |chunk_apply_guards|.

While the SpiderMonkey GC largely maintains it's own data structures, it still uses jemalloc for some key data structures (eg. StoreBuffer) and jemalloc problems could easily manifest as GC asserts.

Back to Bug 1446040 Comment 8