Bugzilla

Note: bug 1521352 is a case of something like this with Google's "Material Icons Extended" font [1] which apparently renders strings like "star_border" as a star-with-a-border icon.

So, not strictly emoji, but still an instance of an "icon font" being blocked by this config option & the page looking pretty broken as a result.  To address that, I wonder if we should have an [optional?] escape-hatch from this option to allow fonts with "icon" in the name, or something like that, if that's even feasible. 

[1] https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/materialiconsextended/v46/kJEjBvgX7BgnkSrUwT8UnLVc38YydejYY-oE_LvJ.woff2

Note: bug 1521352 is a case of something like this with Google's "Material Icons Extended" font [1] which apparently renders strings like "star_border" as a star-with-a-border icon.

So, not strictly emoji, but still an instance of an "icon font" which, when it's blocked via unchecking this "Allow pages..." config option, produces a page that [looks pretty broken](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9037823).  To address that, I wonder if we should have an [optional?] escape-hatch from this option to allow fonts with "icon" in the name, or something like that, if that's even feasible. 

[1] https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/materialiconsextended/v46/kJEjBvgX7BgnkSrUwT8UnLVc38YydejYY-oE_LvJ.woff2

Note: bug 1521352 is a case of something like this with Google's "Material Icons Extended" font [1] which apparently renders strings like "star_border" as a star-with-a-border icon.

So, not strictly emoji, but still an instance of an "icon font" which, when it's blocked via unchecking this "Allow pages..." config option, produces a page that [looks pretty broken](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9037823).  To address that, I wonder if we should have an [optional?] escape-hatch from this option to allow fonts with "icon" in the name, or something like that, if that's even feasible.

[1] https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/materialiconsextended/v46/kJEjBvgX7BgnkSrUwT8UnLVc38YydejYY-oE_LvJ.woff2