Bug 1509933 Comment 19 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar] from comment #18)
> I don't like having multiple thresholds, but have no other better idea than thctanding correct?

Yes, and that is one of our autoplay policy [1] when `media.autoplay.blocking_policy=0`, but that policy doesn't fit all users' requirement because not all user-activations are related with media directly, such as GDPR Cookie Law. 

So that is why I wanted to provide another option ( `media.autoplay.blocking_policy=1`), which is to use `transient activation` for autoplay. We don't have an explicit spec to define if blocking autoplay should use `sticky activation` or `transitent activation`, so I would like to explore it as both ways to allow users to have more choices.

Or do you think who should be involved in this discussion as well if I want to introduce a specific threshold for blocking autoplay?

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p81bYntlLMTxXoANnQXS9KH0TZ4y8aKKeH9x3GVS3eY/edit#heading=h.k3q4co83ntet
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar] from comment #18)
> I don't like having multiple thresholds, but have no other better idea than thctanding correct?

Yes, and that is one of our autoplay policies [1] when `media.autoplay.blocking_policy=0`, but that policy doesn't fit all users' requirement because not all user-activations are related with media directly, such as GDPR Cookie Law. 

So that is why I wanted to provide another option ( `media.autoplay.blocking_policy=1`), which is to use `transient activation` for autoplay. We don't have an explicit spec to define if blocking autoplay should use `sticky activation` or `transitent activation`, so I would like to explore it as both ways to allow users to have more choices.

Or do you think who should be involved in this discussion as well if I want to introduce a specific threshold for blocking autoplay?

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p81bYntlLMTxXoANnQXS9KH0TZ4y8aKKeH9x3GVS3eY/edit#heading=h.k3q4co83ntet

Back to Bug 1509933 Comment 19