Bugzilla

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Not too late to fix these events before they hit 65.

(In reply to Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky, bz on IRC] from comment #2)
> Anyway, the right thing here is to actually implement the spec.  If the spec
> is going to change too, we can track that change, but that's just going to
> affect when the state change happens, not when the events are fired.

(as discussed on irc) I don't think we should change when the state changes at this point, to avoid webcompat breakage.

I'll write a PR for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/issues/123 to fix the spec (change state sync but fire the event async).

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Not too late to fix these events before 65 hits release.

(In reply to Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky, bz on IRC] from comment #2)
> Anyway, the right thing here is to actually implement the spec.  If the spec
> is going to change too, we can track that change, but that's just going to
> affect when the state change happens, not when the events are fired.

(as discussed on irc) I don't think we should change when the state changes at this point, to avoid webcompat breakage.

I'll write a PR for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/issues/123 to fix the spec (change state sync but fire the event async).