Bug 1524787 Comment 9 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
Here are some rough benchmark results. They are quite noisy, and may differ by a few milliseconds at each run.

I think the improvements we can notice with good confidence are for incremental filtering from Part 4 and Part 5:

  Current:        {bro:23.3, brow:17.8, brows:17.5, browse:17.3, browser:17.2}
  Part 1+2:       {bro:22.9, brow:17.7, brows:17.2, browse:17.1, browser:16.8}
  Part 1+2+3:     {bro:21.3, brow:17.4, brows:17.9, browse:17.6, browser:17.3}
  Part 1+2+3+4:   {bro:21.1, brow:15.3, brows:15.5, browse:15.5, browser:14.8}
  Part 1+2+3+5:   {bro:22.0, brow: 9.6, brows:10.5, browse: 9.9, browser:10.7}
  Part 1+2+3+4+5: {bro:20.4, brow: 8.6, brows: 8.6, browse: 8.8, browser: 9.3}
Revision 1 by
on 
Here are some rough benchmark results. They are quite noisy, and may differ by a few milliseconds at each run.

I think the improvements we can notice with good confidence are for incremental filtering from Part 4 and Part 5:

```
  Current:        {bro:23.3, brow:17.8, brows:17.5, browse:17.3, browser:17.2}
  Part 1+2:       {bro:22.9, brow:17.7, brows:17.2, browse:17.1, browser:16.8}
  Part 1+2+3:     {bro:21.3, brow:17.4, brows:17.9, browse:17.6, browser:17.3}
  Part 1+2+3+4:   {bro:21.1, brow:15.3, brows:15.5, browse:15.5, browser:14.8}
  Part 1+2+3+5:   {bro:22.0, brow: 9.6, brows:10.5, browse: 9.9, browser:10.7}
  Part 1+2+3+4+5: {bro:20.4, brow: 8.6, brows: 8.6, browse: 8.8, browser: 9.3}
```

Back to Bug 1524787 Comment 9