Perhaps, there should be a ticket tracking requesting that the "No User Recourse" section be removed. I understand not wanting to subvert the standardisation documentation, and modifying the RFC would assist other browsers ascertaining how to remediate this dilemma (by removing the problem).
Bug 1528738 Comment 26 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Perhaps, there should be a ticket tracking requesting that the “No User Recourse” section be removed. I understand not wanting to subvert the standardisation documentation, and [modifying the RFC](https://stackoverflow.com/q/57251526/9731176) would assist other browsers ascertaining how to remediate this dilemma (by removing the problem).
Perhaps, there should be a ticket tracking requesting that the “No User Recourse” section be removed. I understand not wanting to subvert the standardisation documentation, and [modifying the RFC](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57251526/is-it-possible-to-suggest-an-update-to-rfc#comment140887816_57251810:~:text=Does%20this%20apply%20to%20changes%20to%20the%20RFC%2C%20like%20what%20bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1528738%23c26%20describes?%20Most%20issue%20trackers%20differentiate%20between%20bugs%20and%20enhancements%2C%20hence%20I%20ask.) would assist other browsers ascertaining how to remediate this dilemma (by removing the problem).