(In reply to Patrick Cloke [:clokep] from comment #5) > Florian, is there anything we should do about this? What are the next steps? From reading the more recent comments in bug 1575214 I don't think there's anything more for Florian to do. I'd say we need to decide from these choices: 1. implement this patch 2. do bug 1575214 (with some experimentation) 3. do both #1 and #2 I'm sure we could get some people to test a try build for the patch, which will require assigning someone on the team to pick up the patch. Even if we do that, I suspect we should test removing the synchronous GC in bug 1575214, because GC has made significant progress in 12 years. What do you all think?
Bug 1535133 Comment 6 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Patrick Cloke [:clokep] from comment #5) > Florian, is there anything we should do about this? What are the next steps? From reading the more recent comments in bug 1575214 I don't think there's anything more for Florian to do. I'd say we need to decide from these choices (drawn from bug 1575214 comment 8): 1. implement this patch 2. do bug 1575214 (with some experimentation) 3. do both #1 and #2 I'm sure we could get some people to test a try build for the patch, which will require assigning someone on the team to pick up the patch. Even if we do that, I suspect we should test removing the synchronous GC in bug 1575214, because GC has made significant progress in 12 years. What do you all think?