We should probably either reopen this, or we could implement and ship [smoothedRoundTripTime](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-provisional-stats/#dom-rtcsctptransportstats-smoothedroundtriptime) (and maybe the other `"sctp-transport"` members?) and try to lobby for its re-inclusion.
Bug 1542938 Comment 10 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
We should probably either reopen this, or we could implement and ship [smoothedRoundTripTime](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-provisional-stats/#dom-rtcsctptransportstats-smoothedroundtriptime) (and maybe some of the other `"sctp-transport"` members we want?) and try to lobby for its re-inclusion.
We should probably either reopen this, or we could implement and ship [smoothedRoundTripTime](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-provisional-stats/#dom-rtcsctptransportstats-smoothedroundtriptime) (and maybe some of the other `"sctp-transport"` members we want?) and try to lobby for its re-inclusion, and THEN lobby for dropping this one no longer being mandatory to implement.
We should probably either reopen this, or we could implement and ship [smoothedRoundTripTime](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-provisional-stats/#dom-rtcsctptransportstats-smoothedroundtriptime) (and maybe some of the other `"sctp-transport"` members we want?) and try to lobby for its re-inclusion, and THEN lobby for dropping this one by making it longer mandatory to implement.
We should probably either reopen this, or we could implement and ship [smoothedRoundTripTime](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-provisional-stats/#dom-rtcsctptransportstats-smoothedroundtriptime) (and maybe some of the other `"sctp-transport"` members we want?) and try to lobby for its re-inclusion, and THEN lobby for dropping this one by making it no longer mandatory to implement.