Bug 1547830 Comment 7 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
We can tweak `versions` on line 54 of the gist, I forgotten about that when I wrote it so it might be adding confusion now. I was expecting 

66.0 -> 67.0   en-US = whats new 67.0
66.0 -> 67.0   zh-TW = whats new 67.0

66.0 -> 67.0.5 en-US = whats new 67.0.5
66.0 -> 67.0.5 zh-TW = no what's new
67.0 -> 67.0.5 en-US = whats new 67.0.5
67.0 -> 67.0.5 zh-TW = no what's new

although it's probably possible that we can do 'whats new 67.0' for the zh-TW case, if that's important. Depends what bedrock does for hosting the content; currently assuming the normal location will be used in the gist.

For 67.0.5 -> 67.0.6 I think we have a choice to re-show the WNP, if we want. It gets more complicated at 67.0.7 because we don't know if a user has seen it 0, 1, or 2 times already.
Revision 1 by
on 
We can tweak `versions` on line 54 of the gist, I forgotten about that when I wrote it so it might be adding confusion now. I was expecting 
```
66.0 -> 67.0   en-US = whats new 67.0
66.0 -> 67.0   zh-TW = whats new 67.0

66.0 -> 67.0.5 en-US = whats new 67.0.5
66.0 -> 67.0.5 zh-TW = no what's new
67.0 -> 67.0.5 en-US = whats new 67.0.5
67.0 -> 67.0.5 zh-TW = no what's new
```
although it's probably possible that we can do 'whats new 67.0' for the zh-TW case, if that's important. Depends what bedrock does for hosting the content; currently assuming the normal location will be used in the gist.

For 67.0.5 -> 67.0.6 I think we have a choice to re-show the WNP, if we want. It gets more complicated at 67.0.7 because we don't know if a user has seen it 0, 1, or 2 times already.

Back to Bug 1547830 Comment 7