Bug 1555821 Comment 5 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Chris H-C :chutten from comment #4)
> (In reply to Leif Oines [:loines] from comment #3)
> So they are generated on the initial client and are sync'd across platforms? 
Yes, this is correct.

>Would that allow us to learn which client_ids are using the same fxa account? (if the same item GUID is used by multiple client_ids, for instance).
If the user modifies/accesses the same item on multiple desktop profiles, it could be possible to link them, but an event involving that item has to be generated on each client first. One of the product questions we care most about is cross-device (mostly mobile + desktop) access of the same credentials. Note that the mobile lockwise apps are stand-alone and have unique client_ids (i.e. are not the same as firefox android/ firefox ios). For the mobile apps, I believe we have legal approval to to do this sort of cross-device analysis. Sandy can you confirm this, I think it was michael feldman?  

However I get that we are in desktop realm now so things may be different. 
 
> Is this part of the collection required in order to answer the data collection review's questions? Could we instead use a different (perhaps client-local) id for the items?
See above, yes product management cares very much about cross-device access. Sorry Chris, I could have been more explicit about this to begin with.
(In reply to Chris H-C :chutten from comment #4)
> (In reply to Leif Oines [:loines] from comment #3)
> So they are generated on the initial client and are sync'd across platforms? 

Yes, this is correct.

>Would that allow us to learn which client_ids are using the same fxa account? (if the same item GUID is used by multiple client_ids, for instance).

If the user modifies/accesses the same item on multiple desktop profiles, it could be possible to link them, but an event involving that item has to be generated on each client first. One of the product questions we care most about is cross-device (mostly mobile + desktop) access of the same credentials. Note that the mobile lockwise apps are stand-alone and have unique client_ids (i.e. are not the same as firefox android/ firefox ios). For the mobile apps, I believe we have legal approval to to do this sort of cross-device analysis. Sandy can you confirm this, I think it was michael feldman?  

However I get that we are in desktop realm now so things may be different. 
 
> Is this part of the collection required in order to answer the data collection review's questions? Could we instead use a different (perhaps client-local) id for the items?

See above, yes product management cares very much about cross-device access. Sorry Chris, I could have been more explicit about this to begin with.
(In reply to Chris H-C :chutten from comment #4)
> (In reply to Leif Oines [:loines] from comment #3)
> So they are generated on the initial client and are sync'd across platforms? 

Yes, this is correct, but they can only be generated on desktop (the mobile apps cannot modify credentials).

>Would that allow us to learn which client_ids are using the same fxa account? (if the same item GUID is used by multiple client_ids, for instance).

If the user modifies/accesses the same item on multiple desktop profiles, it could be possible to link them, but an event involving that item has to be generated on each client first. One of the product questions we care most about is cross-device (mostly mobile + desktop) access of the same credentials. Note that the mobile lockwise apps are stand-alone and have unique client_ids (i.e. are not the same as firefox android/ firefox ios). For the mobile apps, I believe we have legal approval to to do this sort of cross-device analysis. Sandy can you confirm this, I think it was michael feldman?  

However I get that we are in desktop realm now so things may be different. 
 
> Is this part of the collection required in order to answer the data collection review's questions? Could we instead use a different (perhaps client-local) id for the items?

See above, yes product management cares very much about cross-device access. Sorry Chris, I could have been more explicit about this to begin with.

Back to Bug 1555821 Comment 5