I wonder if this line from about:support might be relevant? ` Target Frame Rate: 144 ` Is it possible that might be breaking some assumptions in the Gecko / WR integration?
Bug 1556106 Comment 8 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I wonder if this line from about:support might be relevant? ` Target Frame Rate: 144 ` Is it possible that might be breaking some assumptions in the Gecko / WR integration? Or perhaps be relevant to reproducing the issue?