> That's the intended behavior. I guess we could try to preserve some headroom to speed up negotiation as an optimization, but it is unclear to me whether this will be of any help in practice given that the initial number should be 256 again.
It's ok IMHO. It may just happens that some initial messages are lost due to lack of OS in the sender. Not important.
Bug 1562341 Comment 57 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
> That's the intended behavior. I guess we could try to preserve some headroom to speed up negotiation as an optimization, but it is unclear to me whether this will be of any help in practice given that the initial number should be 256 again.
It's ok IMHO. It may just happen that some initial messages are lost due to the lack of OS in the sender. Not important.