Can I ask a very naive question: Would backing out bug 1418629 and parts of bug 1362858 be an option as I've done for TB 68.0? https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/b62ef04e0947bf0d621cc87c2314ac3a4a660359 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/0fb2663f9e540d943e9b6ef6617ead9dca2a5981
Bug 1565919 Comment 10 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Can I ask a very naive question: Would backing out bug 1418629 and parts of bug 1362858 be an option as I've done for TB 68.0? https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/b62ef04e0947bf0d621cc87c2314ac3a4a660359 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/0fb2663f9e540d943e9b6ef6617ead9dca2a5981 EDIT: Would that regress bug 1362858? I don't know what the snippet I reversed: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/0fb2663f9e540d943e9b6ef6617ead9dca2a5981#l1.12 tried to achieve.
Can I ask a very naive question: Would backing out bug 1418629 and parts of bug 1362858 be an option as I've done for TB 68.0? https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/b62ef04e0947bf0d621cc87c2314ac3a4a660359 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/0fb2663f9e540d943e9b6ef6617ead9dca2a5981 EDIT: Would that regress bug 1362858? I don't know what the snippet I reversed: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr68/rev/0fb2663f9e540d943e9b6ef6617ead9dca2a5981#l1.12 tried to achieve. We ran all of Thunderbird 60.x with that backout and didn't see any adverse effects.