BTW, if you use Accericser to get examine the name of the table row immediately after the one I state in the opening report, you'll discover that the accessible name appears to be constructed of the bulk of the contents of that page. It's length is a whopping 32,874 characters (presently). While I could be wrong, that cannot be good for performance.....
Bug 1568229 Comment 1 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
BTW, if you use Accericser to examine the name of the table row immediately after the one I state in the opening report, you'll discover that the accessible name appears to be constructed of the bulk of the contents of that page. It's length is a whopping 32,874 characters (presently). While I could be wrong, that cannot be good for performance.....
BTW, if you use Accericser to examine the name of the table row immediately after the one I state in the opening report, you'll discover that the accessible name appears to be constructed of the bulk of the contents of that page. Its length is a whopping 32,874 characters (presently). While I could be wrong, that cannot be good for performance.....