Bug 1578296 Comment 5 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to alta88 from comment #4)
> In that case, perhaps you can do it as originally suggested and since it's in upstream code, thanks.

"you can do it": Are you referring to me as the one who "ifdef it away"?
I am not entirely sure how to do that: Well actually I noticed the #if !defined. construct in bug 1567057.
 So we simply modify the #if expression to make it true (non-zero) in the case of TB (?).
If, so, what would be the proper compile-time macroname to use for TB?

TIA
(In reply to alta88 from comment #4)
> In that case, perhaps you can do it as originally suggested and since it's in upstream code, thanks.

Thank you for your comment.
"you can do it": Are you referring to me as the one who "ifdef it away"?  :-)
I am not entirely sure how to do that: Well actually I noticed the #if !defined. construct in bug 1567057.
 So we simply modify the #if expression to make it true (non-zero) in the case of TB (?).
If, so, what would be the proper compile-time macro name to use for TB?

TIA

Back to Bug 1578296 Comment 5