Bug 1580238 Comment 0 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME is recorded until the end of 71. We want to extend it, but we can also consider adjusting some parameters.

Now the high and n_bucket are:
"high": 30000,
"n_buckets": 30

Some initial suggestion is changing to "high": 120000, but keep the "n_buckets".
Also, we could consider extending the current one and adding another one so that we can compare that without querying by ourselves.
QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME is recorded until the end of 71. We want to extend it, but we can also consider adjusting some parameters.

Now the high and n_bucket are:
"high": 30000,
"n_buckets": 30

Some initial suggestion is changing to "high": 120000, but keep the "n_buckets" as what it is now.
Also, we could consider extending the current one and adding another one so that we can compare that without querying by ourselves.
QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME is recorded until the end of 71. We want to extend it, but we can also consider adjusting some parameters.

Now the high and n_bucket are:
"high": 30000,
"n_buckets": 30

Some initial suggestions from the time is that: changing "high": 120000, but keep the "n_buckets" as what it is now (30).
Also, we could consider extending the current one and adding another one so that we can compare that without querying by ourselves.

In short:
Option one: Make another probe (QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME_V2) and with high 120000 and n_buckets 30
Option two: Extend the current one and make another probe as well
QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME is recorded until the end of 71. We want to extend it, but we can also consider adjusting some parameters.

Now the high and n_bucket are:
"high": 30000,
"n_buckets": 30

Some initial suggestions from the team is that: changing "high": 120000, but keep the "n_buckets" as what it is now (30).
Also, we could consider extending the current one and adding another one so that we can compare that without querying by ourselves.

In short:
Option one: Make another probe (QM_REPOSITORIES_INITIALIZATION_TIME_V2) and with high 120000 and n_buckets 30
Option two: Extend the current one and make another probe as well

Note: Jan might give other feedback so ni him below

Back to Bug 1580238 Comment 0