Bug 1587145 Comment 6 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Hassan Ali (:hassan) from comment #5)
> v29.3.0 is being released right now. The issue should hopefully be fixed.

The install was successful with that fix but I'm hitting this issue: `Could not find a declaration file for module 'taskcluster-client-web'. '.../node_modules/taskcluster-client-web/build/index.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.` It doesn't look like there is a @types/taskcluster-client-web package. Any suggestions?

With this change from v8 -> v29 I had to separately install crypto-js and hawk v7.10.0 because we no longer use them anymore (no idea when they were removed) per your comment here: https://github.com/taskcluster/taskcluster/pull/2755/files#r418702525
I think the tricky thing is now we'll have to ensure we keep those packages updated based on whatever versions you have pinned in taskcluster-client-web. No good deed goes unpunished, eh Hassan? :)

Btw that hawk package has been deprecated and moved to @hapi/hawk.
(In reply to Hassan Ali (:hassan) from comment #5)
> v29.3.0 is being released right now. The issue should hopefully be fixed.

The install was successful with that fix but I'm hitting this issue: `Could not find a declaration file for module 'taskcluster-client-web'. '.../node_modules/taskcluster-client-web/build/index.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.` It doesn't look like there is a @types/taskcluster-client-web package. Any suggestions?

With this change from v8 -> v29 I had to separately install crypto-js and hawk v7.10.0f. It sounds like we used to have them installed for other purposes, per your comment here, but that no longer applies: https://github.com/taskcluster/taskcluster/pull/2755/files#r418702525
I think the tricky thing is now we'll have to ensure we keep those packages updated based on whatever versions you have pinned in taskcluster-client-web. No good deed goes unpunished, eh Hassan? :)

Btw that hawk package has been deprecated and moved to @hapi/hawk.
(In reply to Hassan Ali (:hassan) from comment #5)
> v29.3.0 is being released right now. The issue should hopefully be fixed.

The install was successful with that fix but I'm hitting this issue: `Could not find a declaration file for module 'taskcluster-client-web'. '.../node_modules/taskcluster-client-web/build/index.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.` It doesn't look like there is a @types/taskcluster-client-web package. Any suggestions?

With this change from v8 -> v29 I had to separately install crypto-js and hawk v7.10.0. It sounds like we used to have them installed for other purposes, per your comment here, but that no longer applies: https://github.com/taskcluster/taskcluster/pull/2755/files#r418702525
I think the tricky thing is now we'll have to ensure we keep those packages updated based on whatever versions you have pinned in taskcluster-client-web. No good deed goes unpunished, eh Hassan? :)

Btw that hawk package has been deprecated and moved to @hapi/hawk.
(In reply to Hassan Ali (:hassan) from comment #5)
> v29.3.0 is being released right now. The issue should hopefully be fixed.

The install was successful with that fix but I'm hitting this issue: `Could not find a declaration file for module 'taskcluster-client-web'. '.../node_modules/taskcluster-client-web/build/index.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.` It doesn't look like there is a @types/taskcluster-client-web package. Any suggestions?

With this change from v8 -> v29 I had to separately install crypto-js and hawk v7.10.0. It sounds like we used to have them installed for other purposes, per your comment [here](https://github.com/taskcluster/taskcluster/pull/2755/files#r418702525), but that no longer applies. I think the tricky thing is now we'll have to ensure we keep those packages updated based on whatever versions you have pinned in taskcluster-client-web. No good deed goes unpunished, eh Hassan? :)

Btw that hawk package has been deprecated and moved to @hapi/hawk.

Back to Bug 1587145 Comment 6