(In reply to Pete Moore [:pmoore][:pete] from comment #6) > Agreed, it would be good to have an AWS fallback to mitigate any of the following potential scenarios: > > * We have problems with licensing Windows 7 / Windows 10 workers in Google Cloud > * We have problems under load in GCP > * We have problems greening up jobs in GCP > > We only don't need AWS Provider support if none of these things go wrong, which is a considerable risk to take. Nothing is migrating to GCP before Nov 9, with the possible exception of some builds pending [hg optimizations](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585133). However, we're planning to turn *off* aws-provisioner and ec2-manager on Nov 9. Generic-worker will absolutely need to support AWS provider so that we can continue running existing workloads in AWS.
Bug 1588834 Comment 7 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Pete Moore [:pmoore][:pete] from comment #6) > Agreed, it would be good to have an AWS fallback to mitigate any of the following potential scenarios: > > * We have problems with licensing Windows 7 / Windows 10 workers in Google Cloud > * We have problems under load in GCP > * We have problems greening up jobs in GCP > > We only don't need AWS Provider support if none of these things go wrong, which is a considerable risk to take. No Firefox CI workloads are migrating to GCP before Nov 9, with the possible exception of some builds (pending [hg optimizations](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585133)). However, we're planning to turn *off* aws-provisioner and ec2-manager on Nov 9. Generic-worker will absolutely need to support AWS provider so that we can continue running existing workloads in AWS.