The indexer has an okay-looking analysis file, attaching it here. Seems like the problem is deterministic as the comm-central version is also sad at https://searchfox.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm And if I force dynamic tokenization by giving the parent of the tip rev the indexer ran, the problem reproduces: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/4c3c765916833c689e4ce5eba5b2144cbb340802/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm Whereas the preceding version is fine: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/71af6eb79bff7007e668cfb26d07547511800b0b/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm Which suggests the tokenizer hates something in this diff: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/diff/8dc620b8bc97f1e32121ebe9076ffec04c28eabc/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm#35
Bug 1588908 Comment 1 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
The indexer has an okay-looking analysis file, attaching it here. Seems like the problem is deterministic as the comm-central version is also sad at https://searchfox.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm And if I force dynamic tokenization by giving the parent of the tip rev the indexer ran, the problem reproduces: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/4c3c765916833c689e4ce5eba5b2144cbb340802/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm Whereas the preceding revision of the file in question is fine: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/71af6eb79bff7007e668cfb26d07547511800b0b/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm Which suggests the tokenizer hates something in this diff: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/diff/8dc620b8bc97f1e32121ebe9076ffec04c28eabc/testing/mochitest/BrowserTestUtils/BrowserTestUtils.jsm#35