So I understand, that: - the crashes here are the same as those collected in bug 1588498 - we actually want to have two bugs Do we then want to keep then bug 1588498 as meta bug collecting all signatures and create concrete todos as bugs that mitigate single aspects/crashes? This seems to be the current idea behind bug 1588498, AFAICS. So once we know, what we can do about a single crash variant, we file the bug for it. This would mean to just close this as duplicate, as it does not add any information, to my feeling.
Bug 1592336 Comment 12 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
So I understand, that: - the crashes here are the same as those collected in bug 1588498 - we actually want to have two bugs Do we then want to keep bug 1588498 as meta bug collecting all signatures and create concrete todos as bugs that mitigate single aspects/crashes? This seems to be the current idea behind bug 1588498, AFAICS. So once we know, what we can do about a single crash variant, we file the bug for it. This would mean to just close this as duplicate, as it does not add any information, to my feeling.