(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #13) > Is this also fixed by bug 1620575? Unfortunately not. > Otherwise we may need a similar fix (ceiling the min size, flooring the max size around [here](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/c2bc259414706ef4be5d13df1344eebb7507a51b/layout/generic/nsContainerFrame.cpp#638)). Unfortunately this also does not appear to be sufficient - tried with https://paste.mozilla.org/Gh7trr52 per IRC, but same results. Backing out the patch from bug 1600919 (which I imagine might not help the issue at hand, given it fixes a height for some things) doesn't help either. Do you want to investigate further here?
Bug 1609446 Comment 14 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #13) > Is this also fixed by bug 1620575? Unfortunately not. > Otherwise we may need a similar fix (ceiling the min size, flooring the max size around [here](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/c2bc259414706ef4be5d13df1344eebb7507a51b/layout/generic/nsContainerFrame.cpp#638)). Unfortunately this also does not appear to be sufficient - tried with https://paste.mozilla.org/Gh7trr52 per IRC, but same results. Backing out the patch from bug 1600919 (which I imagine might not help the issue at hand, given it fixes a height for some things) doesn't help either. Do you want to investigate further here? I'm just mindful that this is an edgecase...