I don't think so, though I'm not entirely sure what that bug covers. Its initial comment references an inter-engine disagreement in interpretation, which we'd like to address, and I'm not sure what the details of that particular disagreement are. I'll mark it as a dependency to establish a relationship, at least, and we can dupe later if appropriate. (In bug 1446011 comment 1, Robert mentioned bug 972041, whose description sounds quite similar to this issue (though that one's fixed, so it's not exactly a dupe). Anyway -- that bug was not considered a dupe of bug 1446011, so it seems like this one probably is not either.)
Bug 1610093 Comment 8 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I don't think so, though I'm not entirely sure what that bug covers. Its initial comment references an inter-engine disagreement in interpretation, which we'd like to address, and I'm not sure what the details of that particular disagreement are. I'll mark it as a dependency to establish a relationship, at least, and we can dupe later if appropriate. (In bug 1446011 comment 1, Robert mentioned bug 972041, whose description sounds quite similar to this issue (though that one's fixed, so it's not exactly a dupe). Anyway -- **that** bug was not considered a dupe of bug 1446011, so it seems like this one probably is not either.)