Bugzilla

In the interest of TB 78 reputation and user acceptance, I'm proposing to fast-track this much-demanded feature using this patch, which can easily be uplifted into TB 78: no new prefs, no c++ code, no translations.

(In reply to Thomas D. (:thomas8) from comment #59)
> [snip]
> **I'm worried that we're not delivering this important and much-demanded
> feature to users as fast as possible. Lots of users have identified this as
> a painpoint of TB 78, so fast delivery will be in our best interest.**
> I like Paenglab's idea in comment 28 of landing my patch as a fast fix for
> TB 78 and gain time to craft a more elaborate fix.
> Fwiw, my patch does not need new prefs, c++ code or translations and I
> believe it was covering all CC/BCC scenarios at a very low cost of
> implementation. I think it's easily maintainable even when we add a more
> elaborate solution later.

I've laid out my ideas for a more comprehensive and versatile, but still low-cost solution in the first part of comment 59.

In the interest of TB 78 reputation and user acceptance, I'm proposing to fast-track this much-demanded feature using this patch, which can easily be uplifted into TB 78: no new prefs, no c++ code, no translations.

(In reply to Thomas D. (:thomas8) from comment #59)
> [snip]
> **I'm worried that we're not delivering this important and much-demanded
> feature to users as fast as possible. Lots of users have identified this as
> a painpoint of TB 78, so fast delivery will be in our best interest.**
> I like Paenglab's idea in comment 28 of landing my patch attachment 9178125 [details] [diff] [review] as a fast fix for
> TB 78 and gain time to craft a more elaborate fix.
> Fwiw, my patch does not need new prefs, c++ code or translations and I
> believe it was covering all CC/BCC scenarios at a very low cost of
> implementation. I think it's easily maintainable even when we add a more
> elaborate solution later.

I've laid out my ideas for a more comprehensive and versatile, but still low-cost solution in the first part of comment 59.

In the interest of TB 78 reputation and user acceptance, I'm proposing to fast-track this much-demanded feature using this patch, which can easily be uplifted into TB 78: no new prefs, no c++ code, no translations.

(In reply to Thomas D. (:thomas8) from comment #59)
> [snip]
> **I'm worried that we're not delivering this important and much-demanded
> feature to users as fast as possible. Lots of users have identified this as
> a painpoint of TB 78, so fast delivery will be in our best interest.**
> I like Paenglab's idea in comment 28 of landing my patch attachment 9178125 [details] [diff] [review]
> as a fast fix for TB 78 and gain time to craft a more elaborate fix.
> Fwiw, my patch does not need new prefs, c++ code or translations and I
> believe it was covering all CC/BCC scenarios at a very low cost of
> implementation. I think it's easily maintainable even when we add a more
> elaborate solution later.

I've laid out my ideas for a more comprehensive and versatile, but still low-cost solution in the first part of comment 59.