Bug 1617261 Comment 5 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
I think `fuzzy` has this same problem:
```
fuzzy(0-1,0-2) fails == foo.html bar.html
```

Here, `fails` is going to overwrite EXPECTED_FUZZY with EXPECTED_FAIL. Which means that the test could theoretically pass with fuzz, but we wouldn't flag it with TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS because we would simply ignore the fuzz.

Similarly:
```
fails fuzzy(0-1,0-2) == foo.html bar.html
```

will clobber EXPECTED_FAIL with EXPECTED_FUZZY.
Revision 1 by
on 
I think `fuzzy` has this same problem:
```
fuzzy(0-1,0-2) fails == foo.html bar.html
```

Here, `fails` is going to overwrite EXPECTED_FUZZY with EXPECTED_FAIL. Which means that the test could theoretically pass with fuzz, but we wouldn't flag it with TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS because we would be ignoring the fuzz.

Similarly:
```
fails fuzzy(0-1,0-2) == foo.html bar.html
```

will clobber EXPECTED_FAIL with EXPECTED_FUZZY.

Back to Bug 1617261 Comment 5