I would like to raise the desperate question whether it's legal and ethical to (re-) introduce a severe [security](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=10261#c93) and privacy violation. Today it matters more than ever that sensitive business information is safe. If voice chats are about personal employee or customer affairs, DTLS 1.0 is a violation of [Article 25 GDPR](https://gdpr-info.eu/art-25-gdpr/). What is Mozilla's legal responsibility in case of merging and releasing an obvious security regression and privacy violation.
Bug 1623511 Comment 4 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I would like to raise the desperate question whether it's legal and ethical to (re-) introduce a severe [security](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=10261#c93) and privacy violation. Today it matters more than ever that sensitive business information is safe. If voice chats are about personal employee or customer affairs, DTLS 1.0 is a violation of Articles [25](https://gdpr-info.eu/art-25-gdpr/) and [32](https://gdpr-info.eu/art-32-gdpr/) GDPR. What is Mozilla's legal responsibility in case of merging and releasing an obvious security regression and privacy violation.