``` annevk: btw, should referrer policy cause a cache miss here? annevk: we clearly don't want to key off the referrer, the image cache seems it keys on the policy annevk emilio: I don't know; consistency with images does seem ideal if attainable emilio: but I'd be okay with trying to remove referrer policy as a key for all emilio annevk: right, my question is whether it makes sense to have the policy as part of the key to begin with annevk: smells like follow-up material then, will keep the policy as the key for now and then probably remove both or something ```
Bug 1642591 Comment 0 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
``` annevk: btw, should referrer policy cause a cache miss here? annevk: we clearly don't want to key off the referrer, the image cache seems it keys on the policy annevk emilio: I don't know; consistency with images does seem ideal if attainable emilio: but I'd be okay with trying to remove referrer policy as a key for all emilio annevk: right, my question is whether it makes sense to have the policy as part of the key to begin with annevk: smells like follow-up material then, will keep the policy as the key for now and then probably remove both or something emilio: note that removing will require changes to HTML, so yeah, follow-up imo (unless non-trivial to add) ```