(In reply to Stefan Arentz [:st3fan] from comment #35) > Petru, what would regress if we change the root folder to the suggested `/storage/` ? I don't have a good feeling about this `.` there, which I assume means the root of Firefox. If we don't have a good reason for this, then I would suggest to change it to `/storage/`? `root-path` is actually the root of the device (and from what I can see it's an undocumented option). So it's actually worse than you think. (In reply to kanytu from comment #39) > That's what I said in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1647078#c4 > > > No file manager would give the option to choose an internal folder. For removable sdcards, their path always start with `/storage/` too. oh I see, sorry I'm still processing all of this, thanks!
Bug 1647078 Comment 40 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Stefan Arentz [:st3fan] from comment #35) > Petru, what would regress if we change the root folder to the suggested `/storage/` ? I don't have a good feeling about this `.` there, which I assume means the root of Firefox. If we don't have a good reason for this, then I would suggest to change it to `/storage/`? `root-path` is actually the root of the device (and from what I can see it's an undocumented option). So it's actually worse than you think. (In reply to kanytu from comment #39) > That's what I said in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1647078#c4 > > > No file manager would give the option to choose an internal folder. For removable sdcards, their path always start with `/storage/` too. oh I see, sorry I'm still processing all of this, thanks! The user can still type the folder out in `about:config` even if they don't have access to it but yeah, not really a use case.