Bug 1648143 Comment 2 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

And as a follow up (either here, or in future task) we need: 

- Identify instances where profile creation date happened after data matching last update (this is about 3% of MAU and this looks to be a weird segment we should isolate?)
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old and updates are disabled (1.5% of MAU)
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old , updates enabled, autoD disabled (1% of MAU)
And as a follow up (either here, or in future task) we need: 

- Identify instances where profile creation date happened after data matching last update (this is about 3% of MAU and this looks to be a weird segment we should isolate?)
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old and updates are disabled (1.5% of MAU)
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old , updates enabled, autoD disabled (1% of MAU)
- Split out by Win/MacOS/Linux
And as a follow up (either here, or in future task) we need: 

- Identify instances where profile creation date happened after data matching last update (this is about 3% of MAU and this looks to be a weird segment we should isolate?)
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old and updates are disabled (1.5% of MAU) `update_enabled`
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old , updates enabled, autoD disabled (1% of MAU) `update_auto_download`
- Split out by Win/MacOS/Linux `os` and `os_version`
And as a follow up (either here, or in future task) we need: 

- Identify instances where profile creation date happened after data matching last update (this is about 3% of MAU and this looks to be a weird segment we should isolate?) `Profile_age_in_days`
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old and updates are disabled (1.5% of MAU) `update_enabled`
- Firefox version is more than 2 versions old , updates enabled, autoD disabled (1% of MAU) `update_auto_download`
- Split out by Win/MacOS/Linux `os` and `os_version`

Back to Bug 1648143 Comment 2