### Security Approval Request * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: Relatively easy, the patch is very obvious. * **Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?**: Unknown * **Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?**: none, nightly-only * **If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?**: Bug 1642991 * **Do you have backports for the affected branches?**: No * **If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?**: N/A * **How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?**: Not likely at all. It's more correct than the code that used to be before bug 1642991.
Bug 1649228 Comment 7 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
### Security Approval Request * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: Relatively easy, the patch is very obvious. * **Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?**: Unknown * **Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?**: beta * **If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?**: Bug 1642991 * **Do you have backports for the affected branches?**: Yes, applies cleanly on beta * **If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?**: * **How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?**: Not likely at all. It's more correct than the code that used to be before bug 1642991.