(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #2) > I'd personally prefer "always the same order". > > The order you gave in comment 1 is what I'd expect. Mmmmh, you said in comment 0 (sic; aka description) that you want: - From - Reply-To - To / CC / BCC - Others And you explicitly said that you find the following confusing: - To - Reply-To So the order mentioned by Alex in comment 1 is clearly *not* what you want, unless if you have changed your mind from comment 0. I think Kai has a point that From and Reply-To belong together logically, and this could be explored with mockups. I'm not sure if having Reply-To further up as Kai proposes is not going to re-create Kai's problem for other users who expect recipients to come immediately after sender, and Reply-to last. Currently, this works as designed, so no defect here.
Bug 1653814 Comment 3 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #2) > I'd personally prefer "always the same order". > > The order you gave in comment 1 is what I'd expect. Mmmmh, you said in comment 0 (sic; aka description) that you want: - From / Reply-To ("Reply-to related to sender, should be ABOVE the To/Cc/Bcc fields") - To / CC / BCC - Others And you explicitly said that you find the following confusing: - To - Reply-To So the order mentioned by Alex in comment 1 is clearly *not* what you want, unless if you have changed your mind from comment 0. I think Kai has a point that From and Reply-To belong together logically, and this could be explored with mockups. I'm not sure if having Reply-To further up as Kai proposes is not going to re-create Kai's problem for other users who expect recipients to come immediately after sender, and Reply-to last. Currently, this works as designed, so no defect here.