> FWIW I think it should probably be 1.0...
Yeah, but it is kind of silly to re-reflow just to scale it up 1px or less too. After digging through all the conversion steps the paper size goes through I think it probably is a good idea to have some tolerance for rounding errors etc. But yes, 0.998 is rather random...
I'll file a follow-up bug on it...
Bug 1689789 Comment 19 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
> FWIW I think it should probably be 1.0... Yeah, but it is kind of silly to re-reflow just to scale it up 1px or less too. After digging through all the conversion steps the paper size goes through I think it probably is a good idea to have some tolerance for rounding errors etc. But yes, 0.998 is rather random... I'll file a follow-up bug on it... (EDIT: filed bug 1690028)