Bugzilla

This report is about large, general-purpose system modules.  After the first batch, these are the most likely to write user-sensitive information to their `__crash_info` sections. I worked through everything they might write there, and I didn't find anything that might be user-sensitive.

So it looks like Apple is quite careful about what it writes to `__crash_info`. I'll keep my eyes open. If I find problems, I'll open security-sensitive bugs about them. But I doubt I'll find anything. It seems like what I reported above about `/usr/lib/libnetwork.dylib` is very much the exception.

Unless something more comes up, I don't plan on writing any more of these reports.

This report is about large, general-purpose system modules.  After the first batch, these are the most likely to write user-sensitive information to their `__crash_info` sections. I worked through everything they might write there, and I didn't find anything that might be user-sensitive.

So it looks like Apple is quite careful about what it writes to `__crash_info`. I'll keep my eyes open. If I find problems, I'll open security-sensitive bugs about them. But I doubt I'll find anything. It seems like what I reported above about `/usr/lib/libnetwork.dylib` is very much the exception.

Unless something comes up, I don't plan on writing any more of these reports.