Ran some **decompression** benchmarks with hyperfine as suggested by :Sylvestre (thanks for the tool suggestion BTW!) Note: vms running with the same version of debian on GCP ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with balanced SSD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop _caches' "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 6.273 s ± 0.251 s [User: 6.057 s, System: 1.118 s] Range (min … max): 6.055 s … 6.690 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 970.2 ms ± 59.9 ms [User: 876.4 ms, System: 697.9 ms] Range (min … max): 867.2 ms … 1090.6 ms 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.612 s ± 1.315 s [User: 20.216 s, System: 2.002 s] Range (min … max): 19.011 s … 22.862 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 6.47 ± 0.48 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 21.25 ± 1.89 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with basic HDD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 7.420 s ± 0.058 s [User: 6.950 s, System: 1.107 s] Range (min … max): 7.340 s … 7.515 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 1.942 s ± 0.119 s [User: 1.176 s, System: 0.758 s] Range (min … max): 1.813 s … 2.202 s 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.234 s ± 0.500 s [User: 19.183 s, System: 1.370 s] Range (min … max): 19.793 s … 21.289 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 3.82 ± 0.24 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 10.42 ± 0.69 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` _____ #### Thoughts zstd is the fastest option, but uses a bit more ram compared to xz (~140mb vs ~75mb) xz is the most efficient compression ratio (~20% reduction vs bzip2, zstd has ~15% reduction) Either one of those options are a great improvement over bzip2.
Bug 1710599 Comment 17 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Ran some **decompression** benchmarks with hyperfine as suggested by :Sylvestre (thanks for the tool suggestion BTW!) Note: vms running with the same version of debian on GCP ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with balanced SSD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 6.273 s ± 0.251 s [User: 6.057 s, System: 1.118 s] Range (min … max): 6.055 s … 6.690 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 970.2 ms ± 59.9 ms [User: 876.4 ms, System: 697.9 ms] Range (min … max): 867.2 ms … 1090.6 ms 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.612 s ± 1.315 s [User: 20.216 s, System: 2.002 s] Range (min … max): 19.011 s … 22.862 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 6.47 ± 0.48 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 21.25 ± 1.89 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with basic HDD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 7.420 s ± 0.058 s [User: 6.950 s, System: 1.107 s] Range (min … max): 7.340 s … 7.515 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 1.942 s ± 0.119 s [User: 1.176 s, System: 0.758 s] Range (min … max): 1.813 s … 2.202 s 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.234 s ± 0.500 s [User: 19.183 s, System: 1.370 s] Range (min … max): 19.793 s … 21.289 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 3.82 ± 0.24 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 10.42 ± 0.69 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` _____ #### Thoughts zstd is the fastest option, but uses a bit more ram compared to xz (~140mb vs ~75mb) xz is the most efficient compression ratio (~20% reduction vs bzip2, zstd has ~15% reduction) Either one of those options are a great improvement over bzip2.
Ran some **decompression** benchmarks with hyperfine as suggested by :Sylvestre (thanks for the tool suggestion BTW!) Note: vms running with the same version of debian on GCP ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with balanced SSD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 6.273 s ± 0.251 s [User: 6.057 s, System: 1.118 s] Range (min … max): 6.055 s … 6.690 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 970.2 ms ± 59.9 ms [User: 876.4 ms, System: 697.9 ms] Range (min … max): 867.2 ms … 1090.6 ms 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.612 s ± 1.315 s [User: 20.216 s, System: 2.002 s] Range (min … max): 19.011 s … 22.862 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 6.47 ± 0.48 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 21.25 ± 1.89 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` ____ ### 2 Core - 2GB ram - VM with basic HDD disk ``` $ hyperfine --runs 10 --prepare 'rm -rf firefox/; sync; echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst" \ "tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2" Benchmark 1: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz Time (mean ± σ): 7.420 s ± 0.058 s [User: 6.950 s, System: 1.107 s] Range (min … max): 7.340 s … 7.515 s 10 runs Benchmark 2: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst Time (mean ± σ): 1.942 s ± 0.119 s [User: 1.176 s, System: 0.758 s] Range (min … max): 1.813 s … 2.202 s 10 runs Benchmark 3: tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2 Time (mean ± σ): 20.234 s ± 0.500 s [User: 19.183 s, System: 1.370 s] Range (min … max): 19.793 s … 21.289 s 10 runs Summary 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.zst' ran 3.82 ± 0.24 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.xz' 10.42 ± 0.69 times faster than 'tar xf firefox-130.0.tar.bz2' ``` _____ #### Thoughts zstd is the fastest option, but uses a bit more ram compared to xz (~140mb vs ~75mb) xz is the most efficient compression ratio (~20% reduction vs bzip2, zstd has ~15% reduction) Either one of those options are a great improvement over bzip2. I'd be happy to run other scenarios if you need.