### Security Approval Request * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: Could fairly easily be used for an information leak. * **Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?**: No * **Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?**: Beta * **If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?**: Bug 1713581 * **Do you have backports for the affected branches?**: Yes * **If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?**: It applies cleanly to beta. * **How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?**: Not likely, has a fussing testcase attached.
Bug 1713581 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
### Security Approval Request * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: Could fairly easily be used for an information leak. * **Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?**: No * **Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?**: Beta * **If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?**: Bug 1699271 * **Do you have backports for the affected branches?**: Yes * **If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?**: It applies cleanly to beta. * **How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?**: Not likely, has a fussing testcase attached.
### Security Approval Request * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: Could fairly easily be used for an information leak, this could leak an address as a double. * **Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?**: No * **Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?**: Beta * **If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?**: Bug 1699271 * **Do you have backports for the affected branches?**: Yes * **If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?**: It applies cleanly to beta. * **How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?**: Not likely, has a fussing testcase attached.