Per comment1, the GPU which the reporter uses is `Intel(R) HD Graphics 620`. On my Dell Xp15 machine, my GPU is `Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630` which is very similar with 620, based on this [comparison](https://www.notebookcheck.net/UHD-Graphics-620-vs-UHD-Graphics-630_8098_8126.247598.0.html). However, I didn't encounter any dropped frame on the same [video](https://www.notebookcheck.net/UHD-Graphics-620-vs-UHD-Graphics-630_8098_8126.247598.0.html) where the reporter saw around 6~8% dropped frames. Here is my [profiled result](https://share.firefox.dev/2YETlDq), the decoding took very short time and `NtGdiDdDDIWaitForSynchronizationObjectFromCpu` only took less than 1% time on the GPU process. Based on this [comment](https://github.com/microsoft/angle/issues/111#issuecomment-279536657), MS people said the problem was caused by ANGLE, and the reporter uses `ANGLE 2.1.14225` and mine is `ANGLE 2.1.15727`. And the [lastest comment](https://github.com/microsoft/angle/issues/111#issuecomment-533701795) (2019 Sep) showed that the problem was still in the ANGLE master at that time. As I don't know much about ANGLE, is that something we can control? Or we need to ask users to update their ANGLE version? Thank you.
Bug 1718814 Comment 33 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Per comment1, the GPU which the reporter uses is `Intel(R) HD Graphics 620`. On my Dell Xp15 machine, my GPU is `Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630` which is very similar with 620, based on this [comparison](https://www.notebookcheck.net/UHD-Graphics-620-vs-UHD-Graphics-630_8098_8126.247598.0.html). However, I didn't encounter any dropped frame on the same [video](https://www.notebookcheck.net/UHD-Graphics-620-vs-UHD-Graphics-630_8098_8126.247598.0.html) where the reporter saw around 6~8% dropped frames. Here is my [profiled result](https://share.firefox.dev/2YETlDq), the decoding took very short time and `NtGdiDdDDIWaitForSynchronizationObjectFromCpu` only took less than 1% time on the GPU process. Based on this [comment](https://github.com/microsoft/angle/issues/111#issuecomment-279536657), MS people said the problem was caused by ANGLE, and the reporter uses `ANGLE 2.1.14225` and mine is `ANGLE 2.1.15727`. And the [lastest comment](https://github.com/microsoft/angle/issues/111#issuecomment-533701795) (2019 Sep) showed that the problem was still in the ANGLE master at that time, but it probably got fixed in the some version already. As I don't know much about ANGLE, is that something we can control? Or we need to ask users to update their ANGLE version? Thank you.