This bug requires considerable user interaction for exploitation, and depends on specific circumstances for a website in order to be security-sensitive. I'm 50/50 on this one, I'd be fine with uplifting, but also fine if we did not. Gijs/Dao: Should we uplift the fix in this bug and bug 1659155?
Bug 1719203 Comment 34 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
This bug requires considerable user interaction for exploitation, and depends on specific circumstances for a website in order to be security-sensitive. I'm 50/50 on this one, I'd be fine with uplifting, but also fine if we did not. Gijs/Dao: Should we uplift the fix in this bug and bug 1659155 to ESR91?