I just realize that the current STR of comment 0 isn't very useful as it seems to describe an exceptional pattern (Ctrl+Shift+P) on Linux, if at all. Also, this bug shouldn't be about using the System Print dialog, it's much more about the new FF-style print dialog. For Windows at least (majority of TB users), Ctrl+Shift+P doesn't exist as a shortcut. I'll provide better STR and more background in the user story at the top of this bug.
Bug 1731183 Comment 35 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I just realize that the current STR of comment 0 are not very useful as they seem to describe an exceptional pattern (Ctrl+Shift+P) on Linux, if at all. Also, this bug shouldn't be about using the *System* Print dialog, it's much more about the new *FF-style* print dialog. For Windows at least (majority of TB users), Ctrl+Shift+P doesn't exist as a shortcut. I'll provide better STR and more background in the user story at the top of this bug.
I just realize that the current STR of comment 0 are not very useful as they seem to describe an exceptional pattern (Ctrl+Shift+P) on Linux, if at all. Also, this bug shouldn't be primarily about using the *System* Print dialog, it's much more about the new *FF-style* print dialog. For Windows at least (majority of TB users), Ctrl+Shift+P doesn't exist as a shortcut. I'll provide better STR and more background in the user story at the top of this bug.