Bugzilla

(In reply to newsfan from comment #107)
> (In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #105)
> > There is also nothing in the list of patches applied to 91.4 and there after that would likely cause such a problem.  
> 
> The entire IMAP startup was changed: Bug 163964 comment #83, it's even written in the release notes.

I wouldn't think that (my) change of Bug   163964 wouldn't cause internal folder corruption but who knows. I haven't seen it myself, but I mostly use "keep messages only on server".  Will ask Richard Leger who requested the change to do folder discovery earlier and see if he sees problems. He has tons of folders that could potentially go bad -- but, if I remember right he also keeps messages on server...

Richard, I'm referring to comments above by filip.paczynski. Thanks.

Note: Bug 163964 title says "Skipping discovery". What it really does is just run the discover folder URL in it's own imap thread. It doesn't "skip" discovery.

(In reply to newsfan from comment #107)
> (In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #105)
> > There is also nothing in the list of patches applied to 91.4 and there after that would likely cause such a problem.  
> 
> The entire IMAP startup was changed: Bug 163964 comment #83, it's even written in the release notes.

I wouldn't think that (my) change of Bug   163964 would cause internal folder corruption but who knows. I haven't seen it myself, but I mostly use "keep messages only on server".  Will ask Richard Leger who requested the change to do folder discovery earlier and see if he sees problems. He has tons of folders that could potentially go bad -- but, if I remember right he also keeps messages on server...

Richard, I'm referring to comments above by filip.paczynski. Thanks.

Note: Bug 163964 title says "Skipping discovery". What it really does is just run the discover folder URL in it's own imap thread. It doesn't "skip" discovery.