It looks like, according to the numbers :tbabos provided, 95 might not be affected and we have a regression in 96? Am I reading that right?
Bug 1745512 Comment 2 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
It looks like, according to the numbers :tbabos provided, 95 might not be affected and we have a regression in 96? Am I reading that right? Possible regression from the changes here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311726 -- this is in 97 though, it wouldn't explain earlier regressions.