> If I'm running FF regulary, FF uses the integrated intel GPU, which is much slower, and much more heavyon the CPU.
It's unrelated to the bug itself but I'm a bit surprised about this claim. I'd expect the Intel GPU to be easily fast enough for browsing, having a similar performance for WebGL (because on Mesa we can use the dmabuf fast paths) and not really be heavier on the CPU. But good to know, assuming you measured this / are certain about it, at least on your setup.
Bug 1755204 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
> If I'm running FF regulary, FF uses the integrated intel GPU, which is much slower, and much more heavyon the CPU.
It's unrelated to the bug itself but I'm a bit surprised about this claim. I'd expect the Intel GPU to be easily fast enough for browsing[1], having a similar performance for WebGL (because on Mesa we can use the dmabuf fast paths) and not really be heavier on the CPU. But good to know, assuming you measured this / are certain about it, at least on your setup.
1: edit: given that this is on FullHD, not 8K or something.