(In reply to Kagami :saschanaz from comment #2) > "Regressed" by bug 1746052. Looks intentional, but admittedly application/json is also kinda special in this case as it can be used with random file extensions AFAIK. NI'ing Neil for details. Yeah, we stopped overwriting `.json` in bug 1684183. I don't know why that patchset would have caused us to start doing so again.
Bug 1768898 Comment 4 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Kagami :saschanaz from comment #2) > application/json is also kinda special in this case as it can be used with random file extensions AFAIK. NI'ing Neil for details. Yeah, we stopped overwriting `.json` in bug 1684183. I don't know why that patchset would have caused us to start doing so again, but I somewhat doubt it's intentional.
(In reply to Kagami :saschanaz from comment #2) > application/json is also kinda special in this case as it can be used with random file extensions AFAIK. NI'ing Neil for details. Yeah, we stopped overwriting with `.json` in bug 1684183. I don't know why that patchset would have caused us to start doing so again, but I somewhat doubt it's intentional.