Bugzilla

(In reply to Thomas D. (:thomas8) from comment #4)
> Created attachment 9285879 [details]
> Screenshot 1: Original field order in TB 91 - equivalent to `street address` first, then `extended address`
> 
> Alex, would reversing the field order to preserve `Street Address first, then Extended Address` (as in TB 91 UI) be an easy gain here (both for display and edit mode)?
> 
> Not sure if merging is a good idea - even though Magnus' comment 2 has a point, but still - merging can always backfire with unhappy users if they relied on separate fields with separate data. After all, we're just preserving `Extended address`, not actively offering it.

(In reply to Thomas D. (:thomas8) from comment #4)
> Created attachment 9285879 [details]
> Screenshot 1: Original field order in TB 91 - equivalent to `street address` first, then `extended address`
> 
> Alex, would reversing the field order to preserve `Street Address before Extended Address` (as in TB 91 UI) be an easy gain here (both for display and edit mode)?
> 
> Not sure if merging is a good idea - even though Magnus' comment 2 has a point, but still - merging can always backfire with unhappy users if they relied on separate fields with separate data. After all, we're just preserving `Extended address`, not actively offering it.